Solution 01

The customer’s brief reaches engineering intact.

Customer-facing teams define the problem and explore concepts with the customer. Engineering checks feasibility before the Brief is locked.

The problem

Customer-facing staff take the brief. The engineers who build it never speak to the customer, and quietly build something different. By the time the gap shows, it is already built.

Geneca found that 78% of teams feel the business is usually or always out of sync with project requirements. Read more

PMI reported that 39% of organisations name inadequate requirements gathering as the primary cause of project failure. Read more

How Mitoma Systems solves it

The people who heard the customer set the problem.

Customer-facing owns the start

The Brief and concept exploration begin with the people who actually spoke to the customer. The brief is authored where the conversation happened, not reconstructed later from a forwarded email.

Engineering confirms it is buildable

At concept exploration the Lead Engineer joins to check technical feasibility. What gets locked is not just what the customer wants, but a problem engineering has signed off as buildable, every requirement carrying a frozen ID.

Every decision traces to the customer

Downstream design links to the requirement, and the requirement links to the customer brief that asked for it. Engineering can always check what the customer actually wanted.

What changes for you

The customer-facing team defines the problem and engineering confirms it is buildable. The delivery team receives an agreed, practical Brief instead of a retelling.

Proof in the product

What the customer asked for, carried to the build.

From the first customer conversation to the engineer’s design, one agreed problem travels with the work, each requirement linked back to the brief that created it.

See Mitoma Systems products →

See the customer-to-engineering handoff in the product.

Mitoma Systems keeps the mission, design, evidence and field data connected.