For compliance and assurance
Keep compliance attached to the machine, not buried in a folder.
Connect every obligation to the requirement, design decision, review and test that satisfies it. See what is covered, what changed and what still needs evidence.
Your world
You must show that the autonomous system meets its obligations, but the evidence is often spread across tools, documents and inboxes. Compliance is then checked too late to change the design easily.
- Applicable obligations are disconnected from engineering requirements
- Evidence is assembled late, by chasing engineers and searching through files
- Design changes can invalidate compliance claims without anyone noticing
What Mitoma Systems gives you
Build the compliance case as the machine takes shape.
Make every obligation clear
Capture the regulatory, contractual and internal requirements that apply to the program, then connect them to the engineering work they govern.
Evidence linked to every claim
Trace each compliance claim to its source, design decision, reviewer verdict, simulation result or test. Gaps and unknowns remain visible until they are resolved.
Changes show their compliance impact
When a requirement, component or design decision changes, see which obligations and evidence may be affected before the change reaches hardware or the field.
Review readiness without chasing files
See obligations, evidence, exceptions, approvals and unresolved gaps in one readiness view that a reviewer, certifier or customer can follow.
You decide which compliance obligations apply and whether the evidence is sufficient. Engineering owns the design, the Mission Owner makes the final readiness decision and the relevant authority gives formal approval. Mitoma Systems preserves the record but does not replace professional or regulatory judgement.